The topic of Comprehensive Comparison Analytics is quite broad and it is usually divided into two subsets – qualitative and quantitative. In this article, we are going to be discussing qualitative comprehensive comparison analytics. Ithe qualitative side is in itself quite broad but we will try to break it down.
Uses of Qualitative Comprehensive Comparison Analytics
There are many ways that qualitative comprehensive comparison analytics can be used but there are also tons of restrictions on where it can be applied. It simply cannot be applied in all cases. When a project has clearly defined contexts and modalities, the qualitative comprehensive comparison analytics can be implemented and used.
Of course, data is needed in this scenario, but not just any data. Data has to be of high quality, qualitative in nature, and consistent across each context. The consistency across different context is necessary because qualitative comprehensive comparison analytics tests projects across multiple pathways and runs tests on different scenarios and combination of variables.
These simulations help establish linkages between outputs and outcomes. There is always a linkage and relationship between outputs and outcomes, however, with qualitative comprehensive comparison analytics firms, can establish sure channels of output and outcomes that leave nothing to chance. Companies can test the relationship between variables and outcomes so when they want to change a particular outcome, they know exactly what to tweak, change, or improve on,
The Best Way to Apply Qualitative Comprehensive Comparison Analytics
Theory of Change
Qualitative comprehensive comparison analytics is theory based and as with most theory-based concepts, the theories have to be of high quality. Only then, can any deduction made from the theory be strong and valid.
There has to be clearly defined cases that can be compared without there being any mixup or overlap. There can exist cases where the project is working in different contexts or through different partners. There also needs to be a clear definition of what factors would be used to determine success. The establishing of success determinants can be done using both primary and secondary data.
Compare Qualitative Data with Quantitative Data
Even though it is a qualitative analysis, it also helps to do some quantitative testing to help compare the data and establish its authenticity. Both types of data can be compared against each other to reach.
Thresholds for Success
In order to succeed, you have to first know what the thresholds for success are and if these thresholds are unknown, then they must be set. That way, each theory can be tested, each outcome, assessed and each output compared with previous and future outputs.
The Comprehensive Comparison Analytics Frame of Reference
In order to carry out a proper comparison analysis, there has to be an in-dept analysis of raw data which is then broken down further and interpreted into meaningful theories from which final conclusions would be drawn. This process takes a lot of time and skill and should not be rushed or half-assed. Each stage from the analysis of the raw data to the breaking down of the data and the analysis of the information drawn must be carried out great detail and careful consideration.
When it comes to comparative analysis and comparison of any kind in general, there needs to be a frame of reference. A frame of reference is a context in which two factors that need to be compared with the other are placed in a different category. What is considered a frame of reference could range from a theory, an idea, a question, general information, etc.
Whatever the frame of reference is, you have to be able to extract at least two types of information from it – for example, biographical and historical. In order to have a solid frame of reference, it is better to extract information about the factors from specific and trustworthy sources as opposed to subjective information or mere thoughts and observations of the person conducting the comparison analytics.
So, for example, say you want to conduct a comparison between two types of phones, an iPhone and an Andriod. Your frame of reference should be the of each device and the known and established advantages and disadvantages of both. The fact that some people find one to fit better with their hands should not be a frame of reference except it can be substantiated with quantitative data (see above).
The best frames of reference are constructed from specific sources rather than your own thoughts or observations. Same if you are writing a paper on a particular topic, in order to prove your point, it is best to approach an argument with theories fro legitimate and recognized sources as opposed to just speculating. Also if you decide to compare two items, you need to provide the grounds for.
This is especially necessary when you are picking those two items from a large pool of other options or when those two items do not obviously go. Providing rounds for comparison tells observers that your choice is not random but rather a reflection of the point you are trying to prove and the comparison you are trying to conduct.